Message to the community from Luren E.
Dickinson:
How does
Shaker Library measure up? We usually compare our library to its past
historical statistics. For example, if
we circulated a certain number of items this year, how does that compare to
last year or the year before? As formats
have evolved from physical to virtual, tracking our progress has become more
challenging.
We also use
comparisons with other libraries of similar size. Libraries compare collection size and usage
counts, such as circulation or attendance.
Perhaps the first nationally known set of comparative rankings for
public libraries was produced by Thomas Hennen more than a decade ago. His American Public Library Ratings rated
libraries based upon fifteen input and output measures collected by the federal
government.
Hennen
grouped the highest rated libraries by range of population served, creating Top
10 lists for each. Nicknamed HAPLR,
these rankings became well known and many times included Shaker Library as a
Top 10 member in the 25,000 to 50,000 population served category. Because Mr. Hennen no longer does the
rankings, 2010 was the last year we appeared on the list. <p>
A few years
ago, Library Journal began publishing a different comparative measure of public
libraries, called the LJ Index. It was
designed by Ray Lyons and Neal Kaske to improve upon HAPLR and uses four per
capita measures to rate libraries grouped by annual expenditures. Top libraries
at each expenditure level were given 3-Star, 4-Star, or 5-Star designations.
Both the
HAPLR and the LJ Index have shortcomings. The HAPLR tends to favor highly
funded libraries, whereas the LJ Index yields higher ratings for libraries
serving smaller populations. A combination of the two different rankings,
however, places Shaker Library in a very good light.
Under the
2010 HAPLR rankings, Shaker Library ranks ninth in the nation for all libraries
serving a population the size of our district or larger. Using the same measure, we are tenth in the
2012 LJ Index. Discounting population
and based only on budget, Shaker Library was the 37th highest in the LJ Index
among all libraries in the nation with a budget of $1 million or more based
upon 2010 statistics. <p>
We received
the highest designation as a 5-Star Library in the LJ Index for four
consecutive years, but we know in the end that rating systems can be
arbitrary. The bottom line is that
Shaker Library is consistently ranked as one of America's busiest and best
library systems. This demonstrates
that—any way you measure it—Shaker Library ranks at the top of its peer groups!
We thank the community for our success because of its consistently high use of the library and because of sustained local funding. We are also appreciative of the support from Friends of the Shaker Library, which helps put us a notch above the rest. As we approach the end of the year, I ask you to consider joining our Friends group (Pick up a membership form at the checkout desk or download one at www.shakerlibrary.org/doc/FriendsMembership.pdf, complete it and return it to either library.) Or you can make a donation to the Library’s Endowment Fund at www.shakerlibrary.org/Donations). Your contribution will help keep Shaker Library at the top of the list!